Talk:Queen Anne Revival architecture in the United Kingdom

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Home Living Mid‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

coining a new term? change article name?

I am somewhat concerned the article may be coining a new term, "British Queen Anne Revival", when that term is not used anywhere in practice. Should this article be moved to Queen Anne Revival architecture in the United Kingdom or something else, instead? There is Queen Anne architecture in the United States, also, which perhaps should be clarified/revised, too. --Doncram (talk) 22:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Anne Revival architecture (Britain) would be best. The move should have been discussed "Chiswick Chap moved page British Queen Anne Revival to British Queen Anne Revival architecture: match other architecture articles" is ridiculous, but unfortunately he has a penchant for these. Johnbod (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If we need to change it to that, no objection; the name must not imply that there is one unified architectural style in Britain and elsewhere, as the styles are quite different. On the comment about me, that's a clear breach of WP:NPA; I made the move to fit in as closely as possible with the naming of similar articles. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Such as? Johnbod (talk) 14:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]